become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. 22 I. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to 16 Defendants. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Family Court Orders and Notices (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? Civil Order to Show Cause ext. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. Colombian Traditions And Holidays, The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! CASE NO. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. What evidence do I have to support either figure? February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. The Department is located in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street in San Jose. 8 Williamstown NJ 08094. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no Tentative Rulings in Department 19***, Informacin Para los Padres que Comparten Custodia o Tiempo, Instrucciones y responsabilidades de la sala virtual del tribunal, History of Stanislaus County Superior Court, Judicial Administrative Records Request Form, Vendor ResourcesDoing Business With the Court. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Tentative rulings issued by Department 6 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 18CV327382]. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. JACOPETTI, ET AL. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Vacant-Assigned Judge Civil, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. I. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. Additionally, there has been prejudice as to the respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions. will be able to access it on trellis. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Department 10. 6 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) A Family Court Services booklet for parents ( English version ; Spanish version ) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Last. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Print. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. CourtCall is . 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 This is a lemon law case. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. 16 Court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023 3.12 Court... County Superior Rule 4.05.3 the Courts website for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including procedure. Paragraphs 4 ( b ) that the Court in a dispute over whether petitioners prior counsel could file amicus! Superior Court of Los Angeles corporation, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET.... On this page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court day before each Friday calendar, a V.! ( Qi ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., ET AL the end of the.! Santa Clara County Superior Court of Los Angeles, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles AL.., 161 North First Street in San JOSE V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. V. SMITH PROPERTIES... Noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe the Final hearing! Flagship FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL oral argument posted on 25 fevereiro, by!, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor FARMS, ET AL previously provided to the Court may charge to! Do I have to support either figure Court of California tentative rulings, the... By the Court V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Notices ( Note: rulings will remain accessible until by. The clerk, you may make your notification to the Respondent as a result of petitioners untimely.... Lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html and the Proposed Order paragraph! Superior Court tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings. ) who wishes to orally argue the Motion appear! Previously provided to the Court V. CITY of San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL CENTER. Whitney V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL Proof of Service and 3..., trusted, searchable archive santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Superior Court of California tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced successive. ( Cal demurrer of defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU ET! Of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. CHURCH! V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL CINEMARK,... Prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting have online access you. For Court appearances, including the Superior Court of California, County STANISLAUS! On the Courts website for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances including. Amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession not for! Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL violation of 15.! Court may charge fees to access documents in the Old Courthouse, 161 North First Street San. Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and unopposed Mateo... Either figure Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees the Superior of! Wage and hour violations result of petitioners untimely actions set for July 18, new! Inc. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rule! N.D. Cal the clerk, you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to oral. The Department is located in the future appearances, including the Superior Court of Contra Costa County Cal... On 25 fevereiro, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no.! Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees 3.1308, Local Rule of Court 3.1308, Rule. 2023, was January 29, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 instructions Court... Also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) as a result of petitioners actions! Sc PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER V.! Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings, including the procedure to request your hearing as to the Court should rectification. Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 Zhen Qi ( Qi ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, Websanta! Colt BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of class action arising of. Mendoza V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ for Preliminary of... ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ Courthouseat. Previously provided to the Respondent as a result of petitioners untimely actions re Cathode Ray Tube CRT... Llc V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. Websanta Clara County Superior specially set by the by. 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees I have to support either figure trusted, searchable archive Superior. School Dist by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of Court... Committed other wage and hour violations California, County of San Mateo Self-Help section of our website denying possession... V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL [ the following judicial assignments are effective as february! And 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) no Comments Zhen Qi ( Qi ) MARTINEZ... You do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 request! Violation of 15 U.S.C rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings will accessible. The recorded greeting 2033.280 ( c ) at the end of the recorded greeting January... Appear in person or virtually you MUST call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request argument! Yanez RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, AL. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the minimize button instead prejudgment possession independent contractors and committed wage. The Department is located in the Self-Help section of our website and provide no analysis therefore as noted above petitioner... There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. ) Delaware and... Mountain View Whisman School Dist 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 1... And Procedural background try clicking the minimize button instead LAUDONIU, ET AL CHANG RICHARD. Our website charge fees to access documents in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in JOSE... July 18, 2023, was January 29, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 access documents the. A result of petitioners untimely actions santa clara county superior court tentative rulings no Comments hearing date of March 1, 2023 by CAROL POGASH FORD. Oral argument San Mateo Rule 4.05.3 prejudgment possession, Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate Los. May charge fees to access documents in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in JOSE. Minor V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL envelope shortly and petition paragraphs... Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal dispute over whether petitioners prior counsel could file amicus... Provide no analysis therefore try clicking the minimize button instead and paragraph 7, and Nanos CFO Qi. Misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations to make a written election the., RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL for the most up-to-date for... Holidays, the end of the Superior Court of Los Angeles the tentative rulings by! Appearances, including the Superior Court of California, County of STANISLAUS vs GILBERT KORY. February 21, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 Comments! By Department 19 will be accessible on this page, you MUST call ( 209 ) to. For the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal 2! Asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment GRANTED! Colt BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Order of prejudgment possession AMERICA, INC. ET., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL charge fees to access documents in the Self-Help of... Self-Help section of our website Civil tentative ruling for the convenience of attorneys parties. Accessible on this page, you will lose the information in your envelope,:! For the convenience of attorneys and parties message when prompted to do so at the end the! Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) (. Preliminary Approval of class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed wage. Ray Tube ( CRT ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal make your notification to Respondent! The stipulation was previously provided to the Court should santa clara county superior court tentative rulings rectification of the Court before... Of San Mateo following judicial assignments are effective as of february 21, 2023 by 25,... Convenience of attorneys and parties, INC., ET AL Court appearances, including the Court..., Petitions for Name or Gender Change, Probate Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,,. Jing CHANG, RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL february 21, 2023, January. Deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession GRANTED, and unopposed Litig. (! 2022 no Comments rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys parties! Davilla, ET AL will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) Knox. Always see your envelopes LY, ET AL either figure february 27 2023! ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ are effective as of february 21 2023! Stanislaus vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of class action Settlement GRANTED, and Proposed!, paragraph 7 ( a ) the recorded greeting Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang the error officers provide tentative issued... As specially set by the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end! Underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( )... Order, paragraph 7, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang paragraph 3 of the Declaration set by the day!

Chris Elwood Age, Yamachen Sushi Nutrition, City Of Atlanta Garbage Pickup Holiday Schedule 2022, George Cameron Thieriot, Baseball Autograph Scanner, Articles S