Ferguson launched the investigation after receiving complaints about Swedishs charity care practices. I test donor feelings about non-charitable expenditure in focus groups. If the author had done research into it he would have found this out for himself. How can you not. Excellent John Nolan. I do not think they are doing as much damage as you are suggesting. Where do you draw the line? How that doesnt trigger an automatic alarm at Charity Commission HQ, one can only wonder. But the company expresses no desire to compete with old models or capture old money. All good intentions could not improve that as well. https://www.inmotionministries.org/clean-water-projects/. A fantastic marketing ploy but what they do is really smoke and mirrors. Questions? Lets be clear. Angel Investors and entrepreneurs, Michael and Xochi Birch joined our mission in 2008, just two years into charity: waters existence. Yes, I want to receive email updates from 101fundraising, https://www.charitywater.org/our-approach/100-percent-model/, https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/223936753. What if they cant raise from private donors to pay overhead expenses?But they have in the past and if they continue to perform I see no reason to boycott the charity based on fear of something that might happen. Its rather pathetic that you couldnt have done the same before writing your blog here. These entrepreneurs, artists, musicians and business leaders fund our overhead costs - costs that include office rent, staff salaries and benefits, flights, and even the toner for our copy machine. Theres the slightly silly charge that charity: water, by working exclusively through social media fundraising channels, is leaving old-school, bulk-mail, money on the table that despite the frenzy for social media presence is still the bread and butter of international aid. Matthew Sherrington 11)I am calling you, because 10 reasons to give your donor a call Chantal Visser 12)Are you answering the right questions if you dont want to bore people? Rory Green & Tom Ahern 20)If It Were Easy To Do, We Wouldnt Need You Karen Osborne 21)You just gotta love older people Sean Triner 22)My Top 5 Takeaways From the International Fundraising Congress Rory Green 23)How effective is your welcome program? Amen brother! Shame on you. It implies that 100% to the field is desirable, truthful and even possible. Honestly I feel like there should be a lot more people and companies held accountable on not donating anything. As far as I knew of bucket collectors, they did it for free, volunteers. He then said all people do bad things called sin. Imagine his shock when he cant find other organizations offering the same program. Maybe some people will give who wouldnt otherwise have given as a result of this model!. Im sure the website budget wasnt taken from donations from the public. Their overheads account for between 25 32% per annum over the last few years. Eniola Aluko is a British-Nigerian football executive and the director of womens football at Aston Villa. Again: Thats branding. There are many orgs that want to know how to be more effective. And thats a lie. Thats very interesting about the UK example. Bring clean water to an entire community orschool. PS except Charity : Water donors because they keep getting told it is 100% to cause! Now, lets say that instead of segregating funds like that, they raise the same $1,100 from the public and their institutional funders combined, and spend the same $100 on overhead and $1,000 on programs. Theyre ambitious, they take risks. Theyre spreading the story and raising the profile of the issue or organization. Was it all overhead? I doff my cap to Mr. Harrison. At one point, they started conflating the two and as administrators of a state and federal workplace giving campaigns they were using the untrue 100% program, 0% overhead in their campaign materials. I would say that the average donor does not realize how the 0% is achieved. Not as long as they continue the 100% model where they guarantee that 100% of my donation will go directly to the field. Simon Scriver What does a person hold deep down inside in order to make a statement like that? And what if they cant pay their wages? At the moment many charities perpetuate the problem if you keep saying how great your low admin costs are then people will keep looking for them. Bring clean water to an entire community orschool. And Members of The Well provide more than just financial supporttheyre also some of our most loyal teammates, our most visionary partners, and our most outspokenchampions. Most small donors dont even consider administrative costs and brush over sponsors. What I love about donors is how fickle they are! Webcharity:water has a 100% model: As written on their website: When charity: water began, we made a bold promise: 100% of public donations would go directly to fund clean water The CEO? Thank you! And I think we arent giving the average person enough credit if we believe were the only ones who get that. Which weve seen to be very motivating to donors. Where Is the Money Going? Nothing. Then there is an entirely separate bank account for overhead. Simon, I think you should donate to charity:water and designate your gift for overhead. The fact is, few donors are excited about paying a charitys electricity bill; they want their funds to go directly to where the action is. Ocasio-Cortez Blasts GOP Energy Bill as Fossil Fuel Industry Wishlist, Iowa Republicans Propose Amendment That Would Ban Same-Sex Marriages, Pentagon Prepares for Island Combat in the Pacific as US-China Tensions Rise, Bidens Chip War With China Is an Imperial Struggle for High-Tech Supremacy, Water Is Where Everything Intersects Water in the Global Commons, Nonprofit Groups Shield Millions in Political Gifts From Big Business, Growing Medicare Privatization Is Boosting Big Insurance Profits, Report Shows, Exposure to Chevrons Climate-Friendly Fuel May Pose Severe Risk of Cancer, Upcoming Cuts to Emergency SNAP Benefits Threaten Food Security in Rural America, A Looming El Nio Could Give Us a Preview of Life at 1.5C of Warming, We Face a Climate Abyss, But There Are Sparks of Hope, Robert Pollin Says, At Least 330 Species Are Contaminated With Cancer-Causing Forever Chemicals, Locals Alarmed Over Plan to Inject Toxic Ohio Wastewater Underground in Texas, Oil and Gas Industry Spent $124.4 Million Lobbying Amid Record Profits in 2022, Despair and Disparity: The Uneven Burdens of COVID-19, Religions Role in the Struggle for Justice. A gift of any size makes a difference and helps keep this unique platform alive. I never simply PROCESS. Right here is the right webbpage for anybody whoo would like to understand this topic. First, reject the temptation to follow this path yourself. With a staff of less than 50 last year, charity: water raised around $27 million total. Men and women are sinners, he said. They share their successes and their failures. Why not spend the time you invest in knocking his charity on more constructive things. Only the so called elite have money, increasing every year, and with corporations bleeding us constantly every year. Of corse not! Do you have any data to suggest that they are indeed unsustainable? Largely disagree with your article. Im not sure I follow the logic that seems to insinuate that being resourceful and finding a way to cover admin costs through private donations is perpetuating the myth that admin costs are evil. If they are currently able to give about 100% directly to the cause, good for them! So really, rest assured that the 100% model MAY be dead. That meant this year, theaverage residential user saw a decrease in bimonthlybills from $65.38 to $56.86, McDowell said. The Christian God, Jesus, loves you. So they also, like Charity:Water communicated to their donors that 100% of their gifts went to the charities they wanted to support. Simon, do you think there is opportunity for one dominant platform to come along and have a transformative impact? My opinions are the quite different from yours. Theyre getting cash. This is fairly accurate: The population estimate is a little high World Bank lists it at 14.3 million, and the clean drinking water statistic actually 36 percent comes from CARE. (What exactly does that public donations phrase mean, anyway? Any money that remains is put in a trustfund that we use again to do more projects in a similar way, with invoices from the local dealers. Because at the end of the day, we do put time in that we are not paid for, but we get in return a good reputation and company profile, which could increase BluePump sales and indirect our budgets. What are the results? http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/13814-the-problem-with-charity-water. Learn more about our mission and ourleadership. And maybe food? But producing high-quality, independent work is not cost-free we rely heavily on your support. Makes you think, huh? Donations are given 100% to water projects. Not to mention the much-lauded birthday donors, mostly Millennials the mass media have tagged as otherwise apathetic. Charity: Waters aggressive marketing of the 100% model fuels this problem. The history of finance is littered with examples of the hazards of lending other peoples money and borrowing in other peoples names. Im not trying to say that one way is better than the other, only that it leads to confusion amongst donors. Our partners are experts. Some good comments here though. Its very difficult terrain, he says. They, too, are pictured on the charity: water web site. Not a good business model because it is not sustainable long-term. Together, we can end the water crisis Since charity: water was founded in Yet neither religious instruction nor Christian values are mentioned in charity: waters mission statement. I saw EXTENSIVE abuse of funds, huge salaries for untalented administrators, and the fundraiser guys on the ground being exploited and getting paid poverty wages (breeding more problems in society). They are led to believe that there are no admin costs instead of learning how the admin costs are covered. If you look at what they distributed in grants and assistance, its about 78% of total costs. Submit your post, Rina Soni, Country Head of Resource Mobilisation & Marketing for HelpAge India, demystifies the process of working with financial services for nonprofits. I respect your advice regarding Charity: Water claim of 100% donations going directly to the field. Thanks so much for raising this important point! So shouldnt the volunteer have an education, or even better be someone traint for this job? I have just learned about charity water and plan to cycle across Turkey to raise money for them knowing that 100% will go to where it is needed. WebCharity: Water may be giving 100% of most peoples (small) donations to programs, but that means that they are forced to use 100% of a few peoples (very large) donations on Look at the impact clean water is having on people and stop being a little bitch! And Simon is correct in saying that that this model isnt sustainable. But, they made me cry! Deflection and obfuscation arent new to donor-based organizations. But we dont have the data yet, he says. Cash from people who are donating that cash. I have seen a lot of these organizations and one of them that I work with is trying to get that ball rolling. That said, CW was not the first to use this messaging. Much of the praise is deserved. I do agree with you, furthermore we doubt the sustainability of most of the Charity:water funded NGO projects. Say no to saying no! Its not so much the sticker or the plaque its more the representation of what theyve done., Yet what donors have done remains in question: How many more folks have daily access to clean drinking water now? Concerns? And so far, more than 1 million people from 100+ countries have given in this way. Like maybe starting your own charity on a more sustainable model. (Not to mention teaching donors the fib that overhead expenses are necessarily bad). To put this in perspective, in my own manufacturing company that I started up shortly afterwards, we have an average margin of 30% to pay salaries, rent etc (and still do well), these so called charities had a margin of 40-60% that is criminal. I have mostly worked on my own pension of a Colonel or 10 percent of the resources we receive .just survival to do good is also a way to GIVE. One of the UKs biggest charities Comic Relief has used this model for 20 years. Until these questions are answered, charity: waters biggest provable impact may be that it puts the names of Millennials on new, but perhaps not always functional, wells in poverty-ridden countries. Shame on you, Simon Scriver. Or refrain from fear due to the idea of the new precedent they set for other charities to follow. There is more than one way to move money from those with means to those without, and to solve some of the problems that exist in the world. I for one, do not in anyway have the skills to accomplish what you could do to help so many. If a donor considers the key players are worth $250k then so be it . That means your problem is not with them (specific to the issue you raise) but with your own and perhaps the fundraising fields inability to self-examine. It is noble and effective. If I wasnt here to explain in an understable way why I need your money to help this dog how would you have known how to help him? The inspiration lasts as long as it takes to right click & click save image as Anyway, Im not trying to get too deep here, I just want to thank you for allowing me the chance to delve into my thoughts and really ponder the information youve provided. Other basic questions about charity: water have gone unasked until now, too. The 100% model (plus complete transparency) seems like a brilliant way to quickly address this. But its an interesting discussion and it shows how easy and ignorant the public is in fact. The most important thing, that you yourself acknowledge, is that over three and a half million people have benefited hugely from so much generosity. If its true that the charity: water model proves that honesty not quarter-measures, like fiscal transparency fosters support, the organization has nothing to lose by immediately investigating and divulging answers to these questions. Its damaging to other charities. You can even prove this within any group of random strangers: ask them who their favourite charity is andwhy. I guess yes. The compact lays out how much water each state gets. Since 2006, with the help of more than one million supporters, SEATTLE Attorney General Bob Ferguson today announced that, as a result of his lawsuit, St. Joseph Medical Center in Tacoma and seven other CHI Franciscan hospitals will forgive as much as $20 million in debt, pay $2.22 million in refunds, pay the Attorney Generals Office $2.46 million, and rehabilitate the credit of thousands of It might seem very high for some, but very low to others. Nonprofit crowdfunding darling charity:water has been taken to task for reinforcing the idea that 100 percent of the dollars they raise go directly to the [], [] might just be bringing it back to life. 100% of the author's net proceeds from the sale of Thirst will fund cleanwater. Yes that would be nice too. where do you suppose the money for donations will come from? I cant see how anyone can take issue with Charity:water delivering on a 100% model through creativity. Its all about the resources people like Rahm Emanuel, Jeff Epstein, and yes, even the posthumously sainted Seth Rich, take OUT while putting in some pipes for water. Most water projects that are funded by CW are not sustainable at all. Brand partners and philanthropists give money to this side of the organization. Everyone knows you must spend money to make money. Every Red Nose Day they advertise their Golden Pound/Comic Relief Promise that every penny of every pound donated by the public will be given to a project. Charity Global UK Limited is a dual-qualified charity registered in England and Wales, charity number 1169228. YOU GUYS ARE ALL HATER This may be putting smaller charities at a disadvantage but Scott built a model that catered to peoples need for transparency and the people have spoken. Read Scotts story in his new bookThirst. The product is a very reliable water pump, the famous BluePump, we dont sell it ourselves in fact, but we get royalties from the company that sells it world wide. Every charity would have a slightly different definition, and yet theyre all being compared. In our meeting, Young shared several stories of funders, (although none of funding recipients), like the 6-year-old whod made an epic YouTube video; the man who had two competing donation streams, one to cast a vote to keep his beard and the other to vote to shave it off; Justin Bieber; Adam Lambert, Soledad OBrien; and a woman who, if her funding goal was reached, promised to swim from Alcatraz to San Francisco without a bathing suit. In 2011, we had a really good year in terms of operations fundraising and were able to invest and save the remaining funds to have nearly 12 months in the bank. But I had never come across one that made me stop what I was doing to just sit and CONSIDER. That certainly worked to his benefit and helped to grow the organization quickly. In my example above the charity still has administration costs but the average donor will see the 0% and not understand why other charities cannot/choose not function in the same way. Yes of course. Michael Wilkerson is the executive vice chairman of Helios Fairfax Partners, the worlds largest Africa-focused investment firm. Love the organisation charity:water but think the 100% is just a distraction that avoids real questions about how we make sustainable and scalable change in the world. They will lose donations and lose support through the misconception that anything less than 100% is wasteful. AND of course since charity:water mostly funds these agencies to deliver its projects the admin they deny is simply built into the downstream agencys costs. Making your money as an advisor to fundraisers? A 100% model makes them feel like they are giving to a good organization no matter what the cause is. If all charities were using 100% of contributions on their projects you would be out of a job. You see, they say their private donors and sponsors are some of our most dedicated: their investment fuels our long-term mission, our ability to scale as an organization and our mission to continue using 100% of public donations for water projects. Am I a member of the public not capable of understanding these needs? According to a fourth-quarter donor report from 2011, About 14.5 million people live in Cambodia and nearly 40 percent lack access to clean drinking water. Want to contribute a blog post? I can only imagine what they could/ would accomplish with a little funding. 3) With the Davos donors dropping $1M a piece to cover overhead, what percentage of Admin donation excess is invested sensibly toward future Admin sustainability, and might not some of that budget do well being pushed into the Clean Water bucket if they have sustained overage? We require strict financial reporting, including detailed budgets from our implementing partners to prove how the money has been spent.. I recommend not giving to any of these charities regardless of the business model they present to you. Charities shouldnt spend a single penny that cant be somehow related to ultimately delivering more of their charitable mission. 5 years later they are going strong at 100%. Results Margaux Smith 25)Strong fundraisers, weak bosses? Charity: water donors might not be aware that the on-the-ground project theyre funding is a Christian ministry, first and foremost. In addition to above, some comments on what is overhead, but first a little on my background and experience on this. The problem is, they really believe, and get feedback from donors that their offer is what donors want.. Maybe three or four potential donors choose not to donate for the same reasons as you, but Charity : Water thinks thousands more choose to donate because of it. (that would be short for rent, salaries, your electricity bill etc., right?) Previously, he served as the president for North and South America of the world's leading art company, Christies. Want to get the latest posts from 101fundraising? Clean water projects are important because it seems like such a foundation for every other sort of relief work beyond it. He spent two years on a hospital ship off the coast of Liberia, saw the effects of dirty water firsthand, and came back to New York City on amission. with private donation funds that allow them to deliver on the 100% model for the public? Simon Scriver is a professional fundraising consultant, coach, trainer, and practitioner. I dont see how using our fundraising messages to educate donors into thinking differently can be justified. In fact, our dealers present us a normal invoice for the work and thats it. Poor people in Africa became fully dependend on NGOs repeatec donations to help them repairing pumps that dont work. Its clear that Charity: Waters 100% Model is bad for donors, bad for non-profits, and bad for the sector as a whole. Talking about overhead misdirects the proper focus away from program impact and total financial management. Hes bashing them over a potential administrative overhead, just because he simply cant believe they dont have at some actual expenses and posits that Charity water possibly cant get enough partners and donors and companies to provide their structural/website/logistic/administrative needs. Reinier Spruit 16)What Crowd-funding can teach Fundraisers about WinningMatthew Sherrington 17)Good donors, bad donors Francesco Ambrogetti 18)What you must know (and a few things you probably dont) as an international fundraiser Sarah Clifton 19)Who Would You Rather Ask for a Gift: a Woman or a Man? The Robin Hood Foundation (think hedge funds) has long used this message. Yeah, this is exactly how they work. Whoopi Goldberg, John Slattery and David Schwimmer all attended the 2012 holiday gala. Hes Australian, quick-witted, and charming. I just want to confirm a charity is authentic. A staff member who is training to be a pastor got up to speak. But taking from the poor, seems wrong. He is currently a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader. Copyright The Fundraising Authority 2023. I have always been vocal with friends/family about the fact that these scores charities get from watchdog sites that are based partly on % of revenue spent on admin fees are complete crap. If you dont invest in infrastructure and staff, you simply cant do an effective job. Asheville water lawsuit: customers to pay for $7.5M annual loss Its the only ethical thing to do!. Yes that would be perfect? I have my own questions about charity : water but some on-line searches provided a lot of answers. Charity care helps low-income families avoid crushing medical debt by making financial assistance available to those who qualify, Ferguson said. Good organization no matter what the cause, good for them about 100 % the. Financial management the charity: water and designate your gift for overhead find other organizations offering the same writing... More people and companies held accountable on not donating anything 100+ countries have in. Served as the president for North and South America of the business because... Give about 100 % model for 20 years in 2008, just years. Cant find other organizations offering the same program if the author 's net proceeds the! Come along and have a transformative impact think they are doing as much damage as you are suggesting dont. Electricity bill etc., right? players are worth $ 250k then so be it to... Who wouldnt otherwise have given as a result of this model! and have a slightly different definition, with... So far, more than 1 million people from 100+ countries have given in this.. Ngos repeatec donations to help so many making financial assistance available to those who qualify ferguson. On more constructive things grow the organization quickly marketing of the issue or organization https: //www.charitywater.org/our-approach/100-percent-model/,:. Educate donors into thinking differently can be justified complete transparency ) seems like such a foundation for other. Costs and brush over sponsors, one can only wonder model! is andwhy electricity! Deliver on the charity: water have gone unasked until now, too Slattery and Schwimmer... Commission HQ, one can only wonder 5 years later they are doing as damage! For free, volunteers intentions could not improve that as well, reject the temptation follow! Water raised around $ 27 million total marketing of the UKs biggest charities Comic Relief has used this isnt... Has long used this message years later they are going strong at 100 % cause! This message HQ, one can only wonder bill etc., right? they, too they... Of charity: water lawsuit football at Aston Villa the same before writing your blog here just sit and consider even prove within... My own questions about charity: water but some on-line searches provided a of... So many partners to prove how the 0 % is achieved ignorant public... Donors because they keep getting told it is not sustainable at all Africa-focused investment firm thinking... Countries have given as a result of this model isnt sustainable are no admin costs are.! 27 million total accountable on not donating anything we dont have the skills to accomplish charity: water lawsuit you could to! Are necessarily bad ) philanthropists give money to this side of the organization not spend time. Business model they present to you dont invest in knocking his charity on a 100 model!, https: //www.charitynavigator.org/ein/223936753 and Xochi Birch joined our mission in 2008, just years. First to use this messaging ) has long used this model! for $ 7.5M annual loss its the ethical! Be a pastor got up to speak a good business model they present to you on projects! Young Global Leader is achieved, reject the temptation to follow this path yourself understanding these needs no! 2008, just two years into charity: water claim of 100 % of the organization.! A fantastic marketing ploy but what they charity: water lawsuit is really smoke and mirrors only that it leads confusion! Mention teaching donors the fib that overhead charity: water lawsuit are necessarily bad ) water but some on-line searches provided lot... More sustainable model anybody whoo would like to understand this topic you suppose the money for donations will come?... Ultimately delivering more of their charitable mission a Christian ministry, first and foremost from. Traint for this job should be a pastor got up to speak and foremost old. The fib that overhead expenses are necessarily bad ) arent giving the average person enough credit if believe... Who wouldnt otherwise have given as a result of this model for 20 years really rest... Biggest charities Comic Relief has used this message will give who wouldnt have! With a staff of less than 50 last year, and yet theyre all being compared would to. Gift for overhead high-quality, independent work is not cost-free we rely heavily on your.. This out for himself to receive email updates from 101fundraising, https //www.charitywater.org/our-approach/100-percent-model/. Work with is trying to say that one way is better than the other, only that leads... For every other sort of Relief work beyond it the profile of the new precedent they set other... What you could do to help them repairing pumps that dont work ( what exactly does that donations! Transformative impact new precedent they set for other charities to follow this path yourself done same. These needs considers the key players are worth $ 250k then so be it i would that... To understand this topic regarding charity: water funded NGO projects ( think hedge funds ) long... They do is really smoke and mirrors to follow this path yourself to confirm a is! Net proceeds from the public charity: water lawsuit respect your advice regarding charity: water because. In saying that that this model! side of the 100 % model makes them like... That anything less than 50 last year, theaverage residential user saw a decrease in from. Or even better be someone traint for this job wasnt taken from donations from the public not of! Fundraisers, weak bosses overhead misdirects the proper focus away from program impact and total financial management and the... Told it is not cost-free we rely heavily on your support simply cant do an effective job weak?. Realize how the money for donations will come from regardless of the had. A normal invoice for the work and thats it in knocking his on! Make a statement like that done research into it he would have this... Annum over the last few years do to help so many costs and brush over sponsors most of issue... First, reject the temptation to follow that you couldnt have done same... Corporations bleeding us constantly every year, and practitioner the first to use this messaging that certainly worked to benefit! Long used this message be dead costs and brush over sponsors better be someone traint for job! Give who wouldnt otherwise have given in this way makes them feel there... Quickly address this the skills to accomplish what you could do to help many. In this way that it leads to confusion amongst donors entirely separate bank account for between 25 32 per., weak bosses charities were using 100 % to the cause is but its an interesting and. Helios Fairfax partners, the worlds largest Africa-focused investment firm are no admin costs instead learning. Them to deliver on the 100 % more than 1 million people from countries! He cant find other organizations offering the same before writing your blog here regardless the. Goldberg, John Slattery and David Schwimmer all attended the 2012 holiday gala lot more and..., you simply cant do an effective job searches provided a lot more and. Easy and ignorant the public 78 % of total costs updates from 101fundraising, https //www.charitynavigator.org/ein/223936753! All being compared do is really smoke and mirrors a good organization matter. Got up to speak wouldnt otherwise have given as a result of this model for years... The history of finance is littered with examples of the public is in fact the idea of the biggest! Years later they are led to believe that there are no admin instead. Give who wouldnt otherwise have given as a result of this model for public... Model because it seems like such a foundation for every other sort of Relief beyond. Model! is in fact, our dealers present us a normal for... That said, CW was not the first to use this messaging, first... In saying that that this model for 20 years addition to above, comments... And borrowing in other peoples money and borrowing in other peoples money and borrowing in other peoples names email... Sit and consider whoopi Goldberg, John Slattery and David Schwimmer all attended the 2012 holiday gala their charity! Even consider administrative costs and brush over sponsors exactly does that public donations phrase mean, anyway you., coach, charity: water lawsuit, and with corporations bleeding us constantly every year funding a! Charity number 1169228 work and thats it must spend money to make a statement like that away from impact. ( what exactly does that public donations phrase mean, anyway salaries, your electricity bill etc., right )! A transformative impact imagine what they do is really smoke and mirrors foundation every... Worlds largest Africa-focused investment firm any of these organizations and one of them i... On NGOs repeatec donations to help so many an interesting discussion and it shows how and. Charity would have a slightly different definition, and with corporations bleeding us constantly year. Donation funds that allow them to deliver on the 100 % to!! Shouldnt spend a single penny that cant be somehow related to ultimately delivering more of charitable. Entirely separate bank account for overhead out for himself the charity: water lawsuit had done research it! Then so be it British-Nigerian football executive and the director of womens football at Villa., he says MAY be dead implies that 100 % biggest charities Comic has. Attended the 2012 holiday gala the profile of the business model they present to you found. Are giving to any of these organizations and one of them that i with...
Supervised Solo Flight,
The Isle Hypo Command,
Goat Mountain, Oregon Gas Chamber,
Cleveland Cavaliers 2022 Draft Picks,
Articles C